Happy Monday all!
I was walking down the aisle of a store in Queens when I noticed the two different Vaseline Jars next to each other. One was pink Baby Vaseline and the other being the common blue jar of Vaseline. So of course this piqued my curiosity...What is the difference between the two? In my mind, I assumed incorrectly (like most people I'm sure) that the Baby Vaseline would be somehow more gentle or appropriate for babies. I don't know how you could even make Vaseline more gentle anyway....so this is why I turned the jars around to read the labels.
Much to my dismay, I found out what makes "Baby" so special. Take a look at the picture. The jar on the left in the second picture corresponds to the Baby Vaseline and the one on the right is the regular Vaseline.
Here are the ingredients...
REGULAR VASELINE: 100% White Petrolatum.
BABY VASELINE: 99.96% White Petrolatum, Fragrance.
Seems like making a product smell particularly "baby fresh" by adding artificial fragrance deems it better for babies than pure product without the fragrance. Shame on you Unilever. In today's age of issues with baby allergens and exposure to hormone altering chemicals in every-day products, we should be extra-vigilant to ensure our growing babies receive only the best in their healthcare products. Now, I'm sure the fragrance is overall quite harmless, but WHY would you even include it in a product aimed for babies, when the regular Vaseline product is completely fragrance free!? This is just an example of marketing at it's best (or worst).
Monday, December 10, 2012
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
How Antifreeze Wound Up in Your Cosmetics
Head on over to DAME Magazine to read this quick and well written article written by Katherine Fleming. It'll provide insight into some very basic and ubiquitous skincare ingredients.
How Antifreeze Wound Up in Your Cosmetics
Nice work!
P.S. It's nice to be back!
How Antifreeze Wound Up in Your Cosmetics
Nice work!
P.S. It's nice to be back!
Monday, August 9, 2010
Difficult to achieve an even all-over tan?
Good article on why our body parts tan differently. As well as some other common findings about skin types and tanning ability.
ScienceDaily (Aug. 3, 2010)
A consistent all-over tan may be impossible to achieve
because some body areas are much more resistant
to tanning than others, a study has found.
Clear here to read
Labels:
dermatology,
research updates,
skin cancer,
sunblock,
tanning
Saturday, May 30, 2009
Wanna get a tan online?!?
Here's something I've been wanting to post for a long time now. It's the newest revolution!Did you know that you can now use your computer LCD screen to create UV light that can be used to tan yourself.
I just had to bring you the good work that ComputerTan.com is doing. Click on the link to get your own "free computer tan" now.
Spoiler:
Please visit the site first if you want to experience it first. Because here comes the spoiler . . . What a concept, kinda scary actually if it were true. The website has been massively popular and contains a free trial to use your computer, but when visitors click on a free trial, the lights start, and then a message come us . . . talking about SKIN CANCER! Yup, it's actually a site devoted to skin cancer!
BTW did you really think I would promote excess tanning on this site?!? Hope you enjoy
Labels:
skin cancer,
tanning
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

